Source note

Escaping the Diversity Trap in Robotic Manipulation via Anchor-Centric Adaptation

Vision Language ActionRobot AdaptationData Efficient LearningReal Robot ManipulationActive Data Collection

ACA improves low-budget real-robot VLA adaptation by repeating demonstrations at selected anchor conditions before adding targeted boundary data.

  • Real-robot demonstrations are costly, so adapting a pretrained VLA to a new robot often has only tens to hundreds of trajectories.
  • The paper argues that collecting one demonstration for many different conditions can fail under small budgets because each condition has too little data, which leaves high action-estimation noise.
  • This matters for robot deployment because sparse coverage can make policies unstable in physical tasks with embodiment mismatch and workspace variation.
  • The paper models adaptation as learning a conditional action vector field and splits error into an estimation term and a coverage term.
  • With N trajectories and K unique conditions, the simplified bound is Cσ√(K/N) + LcK^(-1/d), so adding more unique conditions reduces coverage error but raises estimation error.
  • ACA first trains on repeated demonstrations at a small set of workspace anchors to make a stable base policy.
  • It then runs teacher-forced deviation scoring on probe demonstrations, selects the highest-error boundary conditions, and collects local boundary data.
  • Stage 2 freezes the Stage-1 policy and trains a LoRA residual branch in the Action Expert, so boundary corrections are added without full-parameter drift.
  • On a 7-DoF Franka Panda with 4 tabletop tasks, ACA is evaluated on Block Stacking, Cup Placement, Table Cleaning, and Toy Tidying across S@1, S@2, and S@3 regions.
  • With N=50 trajectories, π0.5 + ACA reaches 46.3% mean success versus 13.8% for π0.5, a +32.5 point gain.
  • With N=100 trajectories, π0.5 + ACA reaches 72.5% mean success versus 31.7%, a +40.8 point gain.
  • With N=150 trajectories, π0.5 + ACA reaches 83.8% mean success versus 52.9%, a +30.9 point gain.
  • The paper reports 20 evaluation rollouts per task-region setting; S@1 covers 25% of the workspace, S@2 covers 50%, and S@3 covers 90%.