Source note

NOVA: A Verification-Aware Agent Harness for Architecture Evolution in Industrial Recommender Systems

Multi Agent Software EngineeringCode IntelligenceAutomated Software ProductionRecommender SystemsArchitecture Search

NOVA is an agent harness for changing production recommender architectures while checking whether each generated change is structurally valid before costly training or online tests.

  • Industrial ad recommenders gain value from architecture changes such as RankMixer, TokenMixer-Large, and MixFormer, but these changes need expert work across model graph, feature routing, shapes, dtypes, serving limits, and business metrics.
  • AutoML mainly tunes local hyperparameters, while generic LLM coding agents can produce code that runs yet breaks recommender semantics, such as masks, attention behavior, or logit fusion.
  • These runnable invalid candidates can cause silent failures that waste training and online experiment budget and may hurt AUC, calibration, GMV, or bias.
  • NOVA stores each candidate architecture as model graph, structural hyperparameters, and feature configuration.
  • Its core mechanism is an architecture gradient: a structured update signal built from the previous change, verification diagnostics, offline metric change, and search history.
  • The harness proposes architecture modifications, filters infeasible or forbidden directions, checks semantic validity and local executability, then trains surviving candidates for offline AUC.
  • Failed candidates are written back as forbidden directions so later rounds avoid similar structural mistakes.
  • L1–L4 task levels control risk: simple tuning and ScaleUp can run automatically, while uncovered or high-risk literature-transfer and open-ended tasks can require human confirmation.
  • In an industrial advertising system serving over 1 billion users, NOVA reports the highest effective pass rate on L2 ScaleUp and L3 Literature-to-Production tasks: 54.5% EPR for L2 and 60.0% EPR for L3.
  • On L3 Literature-to-Production, NOVA reports 86.7% LPR and 60.0% EPR, with EPR more than 2x the human expert loop baseline.
  • One Literature-to-Production cycle took over 13x less human-attended time than the reported manual process.
  • Online A/B tests for the selected L3 candidate improved GMV on three pCVR objectives by +1.25%, +1.70%, and +2.02%.
  • The same online tests reduced pCVR bias by 58.8%, 66.7%, and 37.3% on the three objectives.
  • The excerpt says NOVA reduces silent failures versus coding-agent baselines, but it does not give the exact silent-failure rate in the provided text.